Turanjanin, Valentina

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
orcid::0000-0001-6114-5359
  • Turanjanin, Valentina (2)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Multi-criteria sustainability analysis of thermal power plant Kolubara-A Unit 2

Škobalj, Predrag D.; Kijevčanin, Mirjana; Afgan, Naim H.; Jovanović, Marina P.; Turanjanin, Valentina; Vučićević, Biljana S.

(Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Škobalj, Predrag D.
AU  - Kijevčanin, Mirjana
AU  - Afgan, Naim H.
AU  - Jovanović, Marina P.
AU  - Turanjanin, Valentina
AU  - Vučićević, Biljana S.
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3710
AB  - The paper presents a possible approach for creating business decisions based on multi-criteria analysis. Seven options for a possible revitalization of the thermal power plant "Kolubara"-A Unit No. 2 with energy indicators of sustainable development (EISD) are presented in this paper. The chosen EISD numerically express the essential features of the analyzed options, while the sustainability criteria indicate the option quality within the limits of these indicators. In this paper, the criteria for assessing the sustainability options are defined based on several aspects: economic, social, environmental and technological. In the process of assessing the sustainability of the considered options the Analysis and Synthesis of Parameters under Information Deficiency (ASPID) method was used. In this paper, the EISD show that production and energy consumption are closely linked to economic, environmental and other indicators, such as economic and technological development of local communities with employment being one of the most important social parameter. Multi-criteria analysis for the case study of the TPP "Kolubara"-A clearly indicated recommendations to decision makers on the choice of the best available options in dependence on the energy policy.
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Energy
T1  - Multi-criteria sustainability analysis of thermal power plant Kolubara-A Unit 2
EP  - 847
SP  - 837
VL  - 125
DO  - 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.027
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Škobalj, Predrag D. and Kijevčanin, Mirjana and Afgan, Naim H. and Jovanović, Marina P. and Turanjanin, Valentina and Vučićević, Biljana S.",
year = "2017",
abstract = "The paper presents a possible approach for creating business decisions based on multi-criteria analysis. Seven options for a possible revitalization of the thermal power plant "Kolubara"-A Unit No. 2 with energy indicators of sustainable development (EISD) are presented in this paper. The chosen EISD numerically express the essential features of the analyzed options, while the sustainability criteria indicate the option quality within the limits of these indicators. In this paper, the criteria for assessing the sustainability options are defined based on several aspects: economic, social, environmental and technological. In the process of assessing the sustainability of the considered options the Analysis and Synthesis of Parameters under Information Deficiency (ASPID) method was used. In this paper, the EISD show that production and energy consumption are closely linked to economic, environmental and other indicators, such as economic and technological development of local communities with employment being one of the most important social parameter. Multi-criteria analysis for the case study of the TPP "Kolubara"-A clearly indicated recommendations to decision makers on the choice of the best available options in dependence on the energy policy.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Energy",
title = "Multi-criteria sustainability analysis of thermal power plant Kolubara-A Unit 2",
pages = "847-837",
volume = "125",
doi = "10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.027"
}
Škobalj, P. D., Kijevčanin, M., Afgan, N. H., Jovanović, M. P., Turanjanin, V.,& Vučićević, B. S.. (2017). Multi-criteria sustainability analysis of thermal power plant Kolubara-A Unit 2. in Energy
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 125, 837-847.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.027
Škobalj PD, Kijevčanin M, Afgan NH, Jovanović MP, Turanjanin V, Vučićević BS. Multi-criteria sustainability analysis of thermal power plant Kolubara-A Unit 2. in Energy. 2017;125:837-847.
doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.027 .
Škobalj, Predrag D., Kijevčanin, Mirjana, Afgan, Naim H., Jovanović, Marina P., Turanjanin, Valentina, Vučićević, Biljana S., "Multi-criteria sustainability analysis of thermal power plant Kolubara-A Unit 2" in Energy, 125 (2017):837-847,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.027 . .
10
5
9

Application of multi-criteria assessment in decision-making proces in planning of sustainable development of energy system options

Škobalj, Predrag D.; Jovanović, Marina P.; Vučićević, Biljana S.; Turanjanin, Valentina; Kijevčanin, Mirjana

(1st International Conference on Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Optimization, MEDO 2016, 2016)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Škobalj, Predrag D.
AU  - Jovanović, Marina P.
AU  - Vučićević, Biljana S.
AU  - Turanjanin, Valentina
AU  - Kijevčanin, Mirjana
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3163
AB  - Coal combustion power plant Kolubara A has five thermal units with total installed capacity of 270 MW operates as a part of Public Enterprise which has planned to accept and apply the Clean Development Mechanism (new power plants on lignite and natural gas with higher energy efficiency as well as activities related to the rehabilitation and modernization of existing facilities). Two units were put in operation before more than fifty years and in order to extend the lifetime of these blocks in the process of revitalization, in this paper, beside an existing option which considers coal (lignite) combustion, are analysed possible options of thermal power units with gas and renewable energy sources: biomass, renewable solid fuels, waste materials, wind and sun. Paper presents seven energy system options of the thermal unit status which are described with suitable chosen indicators in respect to different aspects of sustainability: economical, ecological, social and resources indicators. In this paper energy indicators are defined as a tool for the sustainability assessment of energy system options. ASPID method of multi-criteria assessment was used to calculate general index of sustainability and obtained ranking of options. This study presented and analysed cases, with predefined constraints when priority has environmental indicator and different conditions where one of sub-indicators have priority, as an example of applying multi-criteria method.
PB  - 1st International Conference on Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Optimization, MEDO 2016
C3  - 1st International Conference on Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Optimization, MEDO 2016
T1  - Application of multi-criteria assessment in decision-making proces in planning of sustainable development of energy system options
DO  - 10.1109/MEDO.2016.7746550
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Škobalj, Predrag D. and Jovanović, Marina P. and Vučićević, Biljana S. and Turanjanin, Valentina and Kijevčanin, Mirjana",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Coal combustion power plant Kolubara A has five thermal units with total installed capacity of 270 MW operates as a part of Public Enterprise which has planned to accept and apply the Clean Development Mechanism (new power plants on lignite and natural gas with higher energy efficiency as well as activities related to the rehabilitation and modernization of existing facilities). Two units were put in operation before more than fifty years and in order to extend the lifetime of these blocks in the process of revitalization, in this paper, beside an existing option which considers coal (lignite) combustion, are analysed possible options of thermal power units with gas and renewable energy sources: biomass, renewable solid fuels, waste materials, wind and sun. Paper presents seven energy system options of the thermal unit status which are described with suitable chosen indicators in respect to different aspects of sustainability: economical, ecological, social and resources indicators. In this paper energy indicators are defined as a tool for the sustainability assessment of energy system options. ASPID method of multi-criteria assessment was used to calculate general index of sustainability and obtained ranking of options. This study presented and analysed cases, with predefined constraints when priority has environmental indicator and different conditions where one of sub-indicators have priority, as an example of applying multi-criteria method.",
publisher = "1st International Conference on Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Optimization, MEDO 2016",
journal = "1st International Conference on Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Optimization, MEDO 2016",
title = "Application of multi-criteria assessment in decision-making proces in planning of sustainable development of energy system options",
doi = "10.1109/MEDO.2016.7746550"
}
Škobalj, P. D., Jovanović, M. P., Vučićević, B. S., Turanjanin, V.,& Kijevčanin, M.. (2016). Application of multi-criteria assessment in decision-making proces in planning of sustainable development of energy system options. in 1st International Conference on Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Optimization, MEDO 2016
1st International Conference on Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Optimization, MEDO 2016..
https://doi.org/10.1109/MEDO.2016.7746550
Škobalj PD, Jovanović MP, Vučićević BS, Turanjanin V, Kijevčanin M. Application of multi-criteria assessment in decision-making proces in planning of sustainable development of energy system options. in 1st International Conference on Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Optimization, MEDO 2016. 2016;.
doi:10.1109/MEDO.2016.7746550 .
Škobalj, Predrag D., Jovanović, Marina P., Vučićević, Biljana S., Turanjanin, Valentina, Kijevčanin, Mirjana, "Application of multi-criteria assessment in decision-making proces in planning of sustainable development of energy system options" in 1st International Conference on Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Optimization, MEDO 2016 (2016),
https://doi.org/10.1109/MEDO.2016.7746550 . .
1
1