Petrović, Violeta

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
c4f0c747-cb8c-425d-a8c9-8087a469a55f
  • Petrović, Violeta (1)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Color stability of bulk-fill and universal composite restorations with dissimilar dentin replacement materials

Miletić, Vesna; Marjanović, Jovana; Veljović, Đorđe; Stasić, Jovana; Petrović, Violeta

(Wiley, Hoboken, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Miletić, Vesna
AU  - Marjanović, Jovana
AU  - Veljović, Đorđe
AU  - Stasić, Jovana
AU  - Petrović, Violeta
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4050
AB  - Objective To determine color changes in bulk-fill composite and universal composite restorations with dissimilar dentin replacement materials in extracted teeth after staining in red wine. Materials and Methods Cylindrical, 4 mm deep, class I cavities were prepared in 140 human molars. Bottom 2 mm was restored with Biodentine (Septodont), everX posterior (GC) or experimental HAP inserts. Each dentin replacement material was covered with a 2-mm layer of a universal composite Filtek Z250 or Z550 (3M ESPE) or Gradia Posterior (GC). Groups combining top composite layer and the underlying dentin replacement were designated as "composite_dentin replacement." Filtek Bulk Fill (3M ESPE) and Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (Ivoclar Vivadent) were placed as a single 4-mm layer. Color measurements were performed using Vita Easyshade 4.0 (Vita Zahnfabrik) initially and after 48-hours storage in red wine at 37 degrees C. Results Color differences (Delta E-oo) ranged between 2.1 +/- 0.7 (Z250_HAP) and 7.8 +/- 1.1 (Z550_everX). EverX resulted in higher Delta E-oo of the overlying composite than HAP (P  lt  .001) and Biodentine (P = .006). Generally, Delta E-oo was affected more by decreasing lightness (Delta L ') than changes in chroma (Delta C '). Conclusions EverX resulted in higher Delta E-oo of the restoration than Biodentine and experimental HAP after staining in red wine. No significant differences in Delta E-oo may be expected in different composites with the same underlying dentin replacement material. The same was generally true for bulk-fill and universal composites. Clinical Significance Similar extent of color changes may be expected in bulk-fill and universal composites. Highly translucent everX might exhibit greater color differences irrespective of the capping composite than non-translucent materials. Clinicians have a wider choice of composite materials to cover a particular dentin replacement material, for example, everX or Biodentine, as similar color differences may be expected in various overlying composite brands.
PB  - Wiley, Hoboken
T2  - Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
T1  - Color stability of bulk-fill and universal composite restorations with dissimilar dentin replacement materials
EP  - 528
IS  - 5
SP  - 520
VL  - 31
DO  - 10.1111/jerd.12529
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Miletić, Vesna and Marjanović, Jovana and Veljović, Đorđe and Stasić, Jovana and Petrović, Violeta",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Objective To determine color changes in bulk-fill composite and universal composite restorations with dissimilar dentin replacement materials in extracted teeth after staining in red wine. Materials and Methods Cylindrical, 4 mm deep, class I cavities were prepared in 140 human molars. Bottom 2 mm was restored with Biodentine (Septodont), everX posterior (GC) or experimental HAP inserts. Each dentin replacement material was covered with a 2-mm layer of a universal composite Filtek Z250 or Z550 (3M ESPE) or Gradia Posterior (GC). Groups combining top composite layer and the underlying dentin replacement were designated as "composite_dentin replacement." Filtek Bulk Fill (3M ESPE) and Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (Ivoclar Vivadent) were placed as a single 4-mm layer. Color measurements were performed using Vita Easyshade 4.0 (Vita Zahnfabrik) initially and after 48-hours storage in red wine at 37 degrees C. Results Color differences (Delta E-oo) ranged between 2.1 +/- 0.7 (Z250_HAP) and 7.8 +/- 1.1 (Z550_everX). EverX resulted in higher Delta E-oo of the overlying composite than HAP (P  lt  .001) and Biodentine (P = .006). Generally, Delta E-oo was affected more by decreasing lightness (Delta L ') than changes in chroma (Delta C '). Conclusions EverX resulted in higher Delta E-oo of the restoration than Biodentine and experimental HAP after staining in red wine. No significant differences in Delta E-oo may be expected in different composites with the same underlying dentin replacement material. The same was generally true for bulk-fill and universal composites. Clinical Significance Similar extent of color changes may be expected in bulk-fill and universal composites. Highly translucent everX might exhibit greater color differences irrespective of the capping composite than non-translucent materials. Clinicians have a wider choice of composite materials to cover a particular dentin replacement material, for example, everX or Biodentine, as similar color differences may be expected in various overlying composite brands.",
publisher = "Wiley, Hoboken",
journal = "Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry",
title = "Color stability of bulk-fill and universal composite restorations with dissimilar dentin replacement materials",
pages = "528-520",
number = "5",
volume = "31",
doi = "10.1111/jerd.12529"
}
Miletić, V., Marjanović, J., Veljović, Đ., Stasić, J.,& Petrović, V.. (2019). Color stability of bulk-fill and universal composite restorations with dissimilar dentin replacement materials. in Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Wiley, Hoboken., 31(5), 520-528.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12529
Miletić V, Marjanović J, Veljović Đ, Stasić J, Petrović V. Color stability of bulk-fill and universal composite restorations with dissimilar dentin replacement materials. in Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2019;31(5):520-528.
doi:10.1111/jerd.12529 .
Miletić, Vesna, Marjanović, Jovana, Veljović, Đorđe, Stasić, Jovana, Petrović, Violeta, "Color stability of bulk-fill and universal composite restorations with dissimilar dentin replacement materials" in Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 31, no. 5 (2019):520-528,
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12529 . .
16
2
15