TY  - JOUR
AU  - Sousa, Andreia F.
AU  - Patricio, Rafael
AU  - Terzopoulou, Zoi
AU  - Bikiaris, Dimitrios N.
AU  - Stern, Tobias
AU  - Wenger, Julia
AU  - Loos, Katja
AU  - Lotti, Nadia
AU  - Siracusa, Valentina
AU  - Szymczyk, Anna
AU  - Paszkiewicz, Sandra
AU  - Triantafyllidis, Konstantinos S.
AU  - Zamboulis, Alexandra
AU  - Nikolić, Marija S.
AU  - Spasojević, Pavle
AU  - Thiyagarajan, Shanmugam
AU  - van Es, Daan S.
AU  - Guigo, Nathanael
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4837
AB  - This review sheds light on urgent questions that arise from the need to replace a polymer resin,-poly(ethylene terephthalate), which represents 7.7% market-share in the global plastic demand (Plastics-the Facts 2019), by renewable alternatives. The main question that this review will address is: what are the most promising PET replacements made from biomass? Currently, under debate is naturally its biobased counterpart bio-PET (or even recycle rPET), as well as other aromatic key-players with comparable thermo-mechanical performance and enhanced barrier properties, such as poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PEF) and poly(trimethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PTF). They are most adequate for packaging, but not restricted to. Additional alternatives are the miscellaneous of lignin-based thermoplastic polymers, although the technology involved in this latter case is still premature. (Bio)degradable aliphatic polyesters, despite their typical inferior thermo-mechanical properties, can also play a role e.g., among PET fiber industry applications. Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is the most developed renewable polyester, already a commercial reality. All biobased polymers reviewed face a major hindrance for their wider deployment their cost-competitiveness. A pertinent question arises then: Are these alternatives, or will they be, economically feasible? Social, political and legal frameworks together with supportive financial schemes are boosting rapid changes. In the future, most probably more than one polymer will come to the market and will be used in some of the panoply of PET applications. This evaluation overviews sustainability issues, including perspectives on their green synthesis. Moreover, this review does also not neglect the accumulation of plastics waste in the environment and the inherent challenges of polymers' end-of-life. Approximately 8 M tons of polymers waste leaks into the environment each year, a fact not disconnected to PET's non-biodegradability and still insufficient collection and recycling rates.
T2  - Green Chemistry
T1  - Recommendations for replacing PET on packaging, fiber, and film materials with biobased counterparts
EP  - 8820
IS  - 22
SP  - 8795
VL  - 23
DO  - 10.1039/d1gc02082j
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Sousa, Andreia F. and Patricio, Rafael and Terzopoulou, Zoi and Bikiaris, Dimitrios N. and Stern, Tobias and Wenger, Julia and Loos, Katja and Lotti, Nadia and Siracusa, Valentina and Szymczyk, Anna and Paszkiewicz, Sandra and Triantafyllidis, Konstantinos S. and Zamboulis, Alexandra and Nikolić, Marija S. and Spasojević, Pavle and Thiyagarajan, Shanmugam and van Es, Daan S. and Guigo, Nathanael",
year = "2021",
abstract = "This review sheds light on urgent questions that arise from the need to replace a polymer resin,-poly(ethylene terephthalate), which represents 7.7% market-share in the global plastic demand (Plastics-the Facts 2019), by renewable alternatives. The main question that this review will address is: what are the most promising PET replacements made from biomass? Currently, under debate is naturally its biobased counterpart bio-PET (or even recycle rPET), as well as other aromatic key-players with comparable thermo-mechanical performance and enhanced barrier properties, such as poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PEF) and poly(trimethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PTF). They are most adequate for packaging, but not restricted to. Additional alternatives are the miscellaneous of lignin-based thermoplastic polymers, although the technology involved in this latter case is still premature. (Bio)degradable aliphatic polyesters, despite their typical inferior thermo-mechanical properties, can also play a role e.g., among PET fiber industry applications. Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is the most developed renewable polyester, already a commercial reality. All biobased polymers reviewed face a major hindrance for their wider deployment their cost-competitiveness. A pertinent question arises then: Are these alternatives, or will they be, economically feasible? Social, political and legal frameworks together with supportive financial schemes are boosting rapid changes. In the future, most probably more than one polymer will come to the market and will be used in some of the panoply of PET applications. This evaluation overviews sustainability issues, including perspectives on their green synthesis. Moreover, this review does also not neglect the accumulation of plastics waste in the environment and the inherent challenges of polymers' end-of-life. Approximately 8 M tons of polymers waste leaks into the environment each year, a fact not disconnected to PET's non-biodegradability and still insufficient collection and recycling rates.",
journal = "Green Chemistry",
title = "Recommendations for replacing PET on packaging, fiber, and film materials with biobased counterparts",
pages = "8820-8795",
number = "22",
volume = "23",
doi = "10.1039/d1gc02082j"
}

Sousa, A. F., Patricio, R., Terzopoulou, Z., Bikiaris, D. N., Stern, T., Wenger, J., Loos, K., Lotti, N., Siracusa, V., Szymczyk, A., Paszkiewicz, S., Triantafyllidis, K. S., Zamboulis, A., Nikolić, M. S., Spasojević, P., Thiyagarajan, S., van Es, D. S.,& Guigo, N.. (2021). Recommendations for replacing PET on packaging, fiber, and film materials with biobased counterparts. in Green Chemistry, 23(22), 8795-8820.
https://doi.org/10.1039/d1gc02082j

Sousa AF, Patricio R, Terzopoulou Z, Bikiaris DN, Stern T, Wenger J, Loos K, Lotti N, Siracusa V, Szymczyk A, Paszkiewicz S, Triantafyllidis KS, Zamboulis A, Nikolić MS, Spasojević P, Thiyagarajan S, van Es DS, Guigo N. Recommendations for replacing PET on packaging, fiber, and film materials with biobased counterparts. in Green Chemistry. 2021;23(22):8795-8820.
doi:10.1039/d1gc02082j .

Sousa, Andreia F., Patricio, Rafael, Terzopoulou, Zoi, Bikiaris, Dimitrios N., Stern, Tobias, Wenger, Julia, Loos, Katja, Lotti, Nadia, Siracusa, Valentina, Szymczyk, Anna, Paszkiewicz, Sandra, Triantafyllidis, Konstantinos S., Zamboulis, Alexandra, Nikolić, Marija S., Spasojević, Pavle, Thiyagarajan, Shanmugam, van Es, Daan S., Guigo, Nathanael, "Recommendations for replacing PET on packaging, fiber, and film materials with biobased counterparts" in Green Chemistry, 23, no. 22 (2021):8795-8820,
https://doi.org/10.1039/d1gc02082j . .