Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorSalonen, Anne
dc.creatorNikkila, Janne
dc.creatorJalanka-Tuovinen, Jonna
dc.creatorImmonen, Outi
dc.creatorRajilić-Stojanović, Mirjana
dc.creatorKekkonen, Riina A.
dc.creatorPalva, Airi
dc.creatorde Vos, Willem M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-10T11:22:41Z
dc.date.available2021-03-10T11:22:41Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn0167-7012
dc.identifier.urihttp://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1694
dc.description.abstractSeveral different protocols are used for fecal DNA extraction, which is an integral step in all phylogenetic and metagenomic approaches to characterize the highly diverse intestinal ecosystem. We compared four widely used methods, and found their DNA yields to vary up to 35-fold. Bacterial, archaeal and human DNA was quantified by real-time PCR, and a compositional analysis of different extracts was carried out using the Human Intestinal Tract Chip, a 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic microarray. The overall microbiota composition was highly similar between the methods in contrast to the profound differences between the subjects (Pearson correlations gt 0.899 and 0.735, respectively). A detailed comparative analysis of mechanical and enzymatic methods showed that despite their overall similarity, the mechanical cell disruption by repeated bead beating showed the highest bacterial diversity and resulted in significantly improved DNA extraction efficiency of archaea and some bacteria, including Clostridium cluster IV. By applying the mechanical disruption method a high prevalence (67%) of methanogenic archaea was detected in healthy subjects (n = 24), exceeding the typical values reported previously. The assessment of performance differences between different methodologies serves as a concrete step towards the comparison and reliable meta-analysis of the results obtained in different laboratories.en
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam
dc.relationFinnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES)Finnish Funding Agency for Technology & Innovation (TEKES) [40274/06]
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceJournal of Microbiological Methods
dc.subjectIntestinal microbiotaen
dc.subjectDNA extractionen
dc.subject16S rRNAen
dc.subjectMicroarrayen
dc.titleComparative analysis of fecal DNA extraction methods with phylogenetic microarray: Effective recovery of bacterial and archaeal DNA using mechanical cell lysisen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage134
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.other81(2): 127-134
dc.citation.rankM22
dc.citation.spage127
dc.citation.volume81
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.mimet.2010.02.007
dc.identifier.pmid20171997
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77951977802
dc.identifier.wos000277949900007
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу