Differences in attitudes of operators and managers on risk management of pressure equipment
Само за регистроване кориснике
2022
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Objectives. Previous research indicates that models for risk assessment of pressure equipment have not sufficiently or adequately integrated indicators of human factors and organizational factors. Methods. The goal of this article is to check the differences in attitudes of operators and managers engaged in the area of pressure equipment risk management. A questionnaire was designed and data were then collected from 253 operators and managers working with the same pressure equipment in Serbia. By applying a paired t test, differences in their attitudes were checked for issues described by the constructs of communication (COM), potentially hazardous materials and equipment (PHME), process safety (PS), safety and health at work (SHW), organizational change management (OCM), maintenance/inspection (MI) procedures, human error (HE), trainings and competences of employees for crisis situations (TCECS) and conducting research after accidents (CRAA). Results. It is statistically evident that ...the coincidence of attitudes accounted for less than 20% of questions. The highest coincidence is shown for PHME and TCECS, where one-half of the dimensions of the given constructs indicate that there are no statistically significant differences. Conclusions. The differences found could be used as an explanation for high-risk levels of pressure equipment exploitation and how they influence it.
Кључне речи:
human and organizational factors / pressure equipment / questionnaire / managers / operators / differencesИзвор:
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2022, 28, 3, 1793-1801Издавач:
- Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development Serbia [grants Eureka project E!13300]
- Министарство науке, технолошког развоја и иновација Републике Србије, институционално финансирање - 200105 (Универзитет у Београду, Машински факултет) (RS-MESTD-inst-2020-200105)
- Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja [grant number: 13300]
- Развој стохастичког модела утврђивања елемената времена рада производног циклуса и њихова оптимизација за серијску производњу у металопрерађивачкој индустрији и у процесима рециклаже (RS-MESTD-Technological Development (TD or TR)-35017)
DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1937795
ISSN: 1080-3548
PubMed: 34082654
WoS: 000670452700001
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85109940259
Институција/група
Inovacioni centarTY - JOUR AU - Golubović, Tamara AU - Spasojević Brkić, Vesna AU - Perišić, Martina AU - Brkić, Aleksandar PY - 2022 UR - http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4997 AB - Objectives. Previous research indicates that models for risk assessment of pressure equipment have not sufficiently or adequately integrated indicators of human factors and organizational factors. Methods. The goal of this article is to check the differences in attitudes of operators and managers engaged in the area of pressure equipment risk management. A questionnaire was designed and data were then collected from 253 operators and managers working with the same pressure equipment in Serbia. By applying a paired t test, differences in their attitudes were checked for issues described by the constructs of communication (COM), potentially hazardous materials and equipment (PHME), process safety (PS), safety and health at work (SHW), organizational change management (OCM), maintenance/inspection (MI) procedures, human error (HE), trainings and competences of employees for crisis situations (TCECS) and conducting research after accidents (CRAA). Results. It is statistically evident that the coincidence of attitudes accounted for less than 20% of questions. The highest coincidence is shown for PHME and TCECS, where one-half of the dimensions of the given constructs indicate that there are no statistically significant differences. Conclusions. The differences found could be used as an explanation for high-risk levels of pressure equipment exploitation and how they influence it. PB - Taylor and Francis Ltd. T2 - International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics T1 - Differences in attitudes of operators and managers on risk management of pressure equipment EP - 1801 IS - 3 SP - 1793 VL - 28 DO - 10.1080/10803548.2021.1937795 ER -
@article{ author = "Golubović, Tamara and Spasojević Brkić, Vesna and Perišić, Martina and Brkić, Aleksandar", year = "2022", abstract = "Objectives. Previous research indicates that models for risk assessment of pressure equipment have not sufficiently or adequately integrated indicators of human factors and organizational factors. Methods. The goal of this article is to check the differences in attitudes of operators and managers engaged in the area of pressure equipment risk management. A questionnaire was designed and data were then collected from 253 operators and managers working with the same pressure equipment in Serbia. By applying a paired t test, differences in their attitudes were checked for issues described by the constructs of communication (COM), potentially hazardous materials and equipment (PHME), process safety (PS), safety and health at work (SHW), organizational change management (OCM), maintenance/inspection (MI) procedures, human error (HE), trainings and competences of employees for crisis situations (TCECS) and conducting research after accidents (CRAA). Results. It is statistically evident that the coincidence of attitudes accounted for less than 20% of questions. The highest coincidence is shown for PHME and TCECS, where one-half of the dimensions of the given constructs indicate that there are no statistically significant differences. Conclusions. The differences found could be used as an explanation for high-risk levels of pressure equipment exploitation and how they influence it.", publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.", journal = "International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics", title = "Differences in attitudes of operators and managers on risk management of pressure equipment", pages = "1801-1793", number = "3", volume = "28", doi = "10.1080/10803548.2021.1937795" }
Golubović, T., Spasojević Brkić, V., Perišić, M.,& Brkić, A.. (2022). Differences in attitudes of operators and managers on risk management of pressure equipment. in International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics Taylor and Francis Ltd.., 28(3), 1793-1801. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1937795
Golubović T, Spasojević Brkić V, Perišić M, Brkić A. Differences in attitudes of operators and managers on risk management of pressure equipment. in International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2022;28(3):1793-1801. doi:10.1080/10803548.2021.1937795 .
Golubović, Tamara, Spasojević Brkić, Vesna, Perišić, Martina, Brkić, Aleksandar, "Differences in attitudes of operators and managers on risk management of pressure equipment" in International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28, no. 3 (2022):1793-1801, https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1937795 . .