Comparison of different technologies for alginate beads production
Authorized Users Only
2008
Authors
Pruesse, UlfBilancetti, Luca
Bucko, Marek
Bugarski, Branko

Bukowski, Jozef
Gemeiner, Peter
Lewinska, Dorota
Manojlović, Verica

Massart, Benjamin
Nastruzzi, Claudio

Nedović, Viktor

Poncelet, Denis
Siebenhaar, Swen
Tobler, Lucien
Tosi, Azzurra
Vikartovska, Alica
Vorlop, Klaus-Dieter
Article (Published version)

Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This paper describes the results of the round robin experiment "Bead production technologies" carried out during the COST 840 action "Bioencapsulation Innovation and Technologies" within the 5th Framework Program of the European Community. In this round robin experiment, calcium alginate hydrogel beads with the diameter of (800 +/- 100) mu m were produced by the most common bead production technologies using 0.5-4 mass % sodium alginate solutions as starting material. Dynamic viscosity of the alginate solutions ranged from less than 50 mPa s up to more than 10000 mPa s. With the coaxial air-flow and electrostatic enhanced dropping technologies as well as with the JetCutter technology in the soft-landing mode, beads were produced from all alginate solutions, whereas the vibration technology was not capable to process the high-viscosity 3 % and 4 % alginate solutions. Spherical beads were generated by the electrostatic and the JetCutter technologies. Slightly deformed beads were obtained... from high-viscosity alginate solutions using the coaxial airflow and from the 0.5 % and 2 % alginate solutions using the vibration technology. The rate of bead production using the JetCutter was about 10 times higher than with the vibration technology and more than 10000 times higher than with the coaxial air-flow and electrostatic technology.
Keywords:
droplet generation / coaxial air-flow / electrostatic / vibration / JetCutter / alginate beadsSource:
Chemical Papers, 2008, 62, 4, 364-374Publisher:
- Springer International Publishing Ag, Cham
DOI: 10.2478/s11696-008-0035-x
ISSN: 2585-7290
WoS: 000257368700005
Scopus: 2-s2.0-46649103274
Institution/Community
Tehnološko-metalurški fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Pruesse, Ulf AU - Bilancetti, Luca AU - Bucko, Marek AU - Bugarski, Branko AU - Bukowski, Jozef AU - Gemeiner, Peter AU - Lewinska, Dorota AU - Manojlović, Verica AU - Massart, Benjamin AU - Nastruzzi, Claudio AU - Nedović, Viktor AU - Poncelet, Denis AU - Siebenhaar, Swen AU - Tobler, Lucien AU - Tosi, Azzurra AU - Vikartovska, Alica AU - Vorlop, Klaus-Dieter PY - 2008 UR - http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1236 AB - This paper describes the results of the round robin experiment "Bead production technologies" carried out during the COST 840 action "Bioencapsulation Innovation and Technologies" within the 5th Framework Program of the European Community. In this round robin experiment, calcium alginate hydrogel beads with the diameter of (800 +/- 100) mu m were produced by the most common bead production technologies using 0.5-4 mass % sodium alginate solutions as starting material. Dynamic viscosity of the alginate solutions ranged from less than 50 mPa s up to more than 10000 mPa s. With the coaxial air-flow and electrostatic enhanced dropping technologies as well as with the JetCutter technology in the soft-landing mode, beads were produced from all alginate solutions, whereas the vibration technology was not capable to process the high-viscosity 3 % and 4 % alginate solutions. Spherical beads were generated by the electrostatic and the JetCutter technologies. Slightly deformed beads were obtained from high-viscosity alginate solutions using the coaxial airflow and from the 0.5 % and 2 % alginate solutions using the vibration technology. The rate of bead production using the JetCutter was about 10 times higher than with the vibration technology and more than 10000 times higher than with the coaxial air-flow and electrostatic technology. PB - Springer International Publishing Ag, Cham T2 - Chemical Papers T1 - Comparison of different technologies for alginate beads production EP - 374 IS - 4 SP - 364 VL - 62 DO - 10.2478/s11696-008-0035-x ER -
@article{ author = "Pruesse, Ulf and Bilancetti, Luca and Bucko, Marek and Bugarski, Branko and Bukowski, Jozef and Gemeiner, Peter and Lewinska, Dorota and Manojlović, Verica and Massart, Benjamin and Nastruzzi, Claudio and Nedović, Viktor and Poncelet, Denis and Siebenhaar, Swen and Tobler, Lucien and Tosi, Azzurra and Vikartovska, Alica and Vorlop, Klaus-Dieter", year = "2008", abstract = "This paper describes the results of the round robin experiment "Bead production technologies" carried out during the COST 840 action "Bioencapsulation Innovation and Technologies" within the 5th Framework Program of the European Community. In this round robin experiment, calcium alginate hydrogel beads with the diameter of (800 +/- 100) mu m were produced by the most common bead production technologies using 0.5-4 mass % sodium alginate solutions as starting material. Dynamic viscosity of the alginate solutions ranged from less than 50 mPa s up to more than 10000 mPa s. With the coaxial air-flow and electrostatic enhanced dropping technologies as well as with the JetCutter technology in the soft-landing mode, beads were produced from all alginate solutions, whereas the vibration technology was not capable to process the high-viscosity 3 % and 4 % alginate solutions. Spherical beads were generated by the electrostatic and the JetCutter technologies. Slightly deformed beads were obtained from high-viscosity alginate solutions using the coaxial airflow and from the 0.5 % and 2 % alginate solutions using the vibration technology. The rate of bead production using the JetCutter was about 10 times higher than with the vibration technology and more than 10000 times higher than with the coaxial air-flow and electrostatic technology.", publisher = "Springer International Publishing Ag, Cham", journal = "Chemical Papers", title = "Comparison of different technologies for alginate beads production", pages = "374-364", number = "4", volume = "62", doi = "10.2478/s11696-008-0035-x" }
Pruesse, U., Bilancetti, L., Bucko, M., Bugarski, B., Bukowski, J., Gemeiner, P., Lewinska, D., Manojlović, V., Massart, B., Nastruzzi, C., Nedović, V., Poncelet, D., Siebenhaar, S., Tobler, L., Tosi, A., Vikartovska, A.,& Vorlop, K.. (2008). Comparison of different technologies for alginate beads production. in Chemical Papers Springer International Publishing Ag, Cham., 62(4), 364-374. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-008-0035-x
Pruesse U, Bilancetti L, Bucko M, Bugarski B, Bukowski J, Gemeiner P, Lewinska D, Manojlović V, Massart B, Nastruzzi C, Nedović V, Poncelet D, Siebenhaar S, Tobler L, Tosi A, Vikartovska A, Vorlop K. Comparison of different technologies for alginate beads production. in Chemical Papers. 2008;62(4):364-374. doi:10.2478/s11696-008-0035-x .
Pruesse, Ulf, Bilancetti, Luca, Bucko, Marek, Bugarski, Branko, Bukowski, Jozef, Gemeiner, Peter, Lewinska, Dorota, Manojlović, Verica, Massart, Benjamin, Nastruzzi, Claudio, Nedović, Viktor, Poncelet, Denis, Siebenhaar, Swen, Tobler, Lucien, Tosi, Azzurra, Vikartovska, Alica, Vorlop, Klaus-Dieter, "Comparison of different technologies for alginate beads production" in Chemical Papers, 62, no. 4 (2008):364-374, https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-008-0035-x . .