Recently. it has come to our attention, that a polemical note by Milonjic [S.K. Milonjic, Comments on "factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite", J. Hazard. Mater. 162 (2009) 1588-1589]. has been published raising several critical comments on some experimental procedures, as well as the presentation and interpretation of some data found in the cited paper by Smiciklas et al. [L. Smiciklas, A. Onjia. S. Raicevic, Dj. Janackovic, M. Mitric, Factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite, J. Hazard. Mater. 152 (2008) 876-884]. Since we have not received any prior copy of this discussion through the process involved in the acceptance of these comments, we now take the opportunity of responding. We have reviewed some scientific papers dealing with cation sorption, in order to demonstrate variety of experimental approaches used for batch sorption tests, regarding solution pH. Finally, we justified experimental methods and data interpretatio...n methods we chose to perform in the mentioned manuscript.
Keywords:
Hydroxyapatite / Cation sorption / Point of zero charge / Sorption isotherm
Source:
Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 168, 1, 560-562
TY - JOUR
AU - Smičiklas, Ivana D.
AU - Onjia, Antonije
AU - Raičević, Slavica
AU - Janaćković, Đorđe
PY - 2009
UR - http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1440
AB - Recently. it has come to our attention, that a polemical note by Milonjic [S.K. Milonjic, Comments on "factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite", J. Hazard. Mater. 162 (2009) 1588-1589]. has been published raising several critical comments on some experimental procedures, as well as the presentation and interpretation of some data found in the cited paper by Smiciklas et al. [L. Smiciklas, A. Onjia. S. Raicevic, Dj. Janackovic, M. Mitric, Factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite, J. Hazard. Mater. 152 (2008) 876-884]. Since we have not received any prior copy of this discussion through the process involved in the acceptance of these comments, we now take the opportunity of responding. We have reviewed some scientific papers dealing with cation sorption, in order to demonstrate variety of experimental approaches used for batch sorption tests, regarding solution pH. Finally, we justified experimental methods and data interpretation methods we chose to perform in the mentioned manuscript.
PB - Elsevier, Amsterdam
T2 - Journal of Hazardous Materials
T1 - Authors' response to comments on "Factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite" Discussion
EP - 562
IS - 1
SP - 560
VL - 168
DO - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.137
ER -
@article{
author = "Smičiklas, Ivana D. and Onjia, Antonije and Raičević, Slavica and Janaćković, Đorđe",
year = "2009",
abstract = "Recently. it has come to our attention, that a polemical note by Milonjic [S.K. Milonjic, Comments on "factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite", J. Hazard. Mater. 162 (2009) 1588-1589]. has been published raising several critical comments on some experimental procedures, as well as the presentation and interpretation of some data found in the cited paper by Smiciklas et al. [L. Smiciklas, A. Onjia. S. Raicevic, Dj. Janackovic, M. Mitric, Factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite, J. Hazard. Mater. 152 (2008) 876-884]. Since we have not received any prior copy of this discussion through the process involved in the acceptance of these comments, we now take the opportunity of responding. We have reviewed some scientific papers dealing with cation sorption, in order to demonstrate variety of experimental approaches used for batch sorption tests, regarding solution pH. Finally, we justified experimental methods and data interpretation methods we chose to perform in the mentioned manuscript.",
publisher = "Elsevier, Amsterdam",
journal = "Journal of Hazardous Materials",
title = "Authors' response to comments on "Factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite" Discussion",
pages = "562-560",
number = "1",
volume = "168",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.137"
}
Smičiklas, I. D., Onjia, A., Raičević, S.,& Janaćković, Đ.. (2009). Authors' response to comments on "Factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite" Discussion. in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Elsevier, Amsterdam., 168(1), 560-562.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.137
Smičiklas ID, Onjia A, Raičević S, Janaćković Đ. Authors' response to comments on "Factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite" Discussion. in Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2009;168(1):560-562.
doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.137 .
Smičiklas, Ivana D., Onjia, Antonije, Raičević, Slavica, Janaćković, Đorđe, "Authors' response to comments on "Factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite" Discussion" in Journal of Hazardous Materials, 168, no. 1 (2009):560-562,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.137 . .
