TechnoRep - Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   TechnoRep
  • Tehnološko-metalurški fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications (TMF)
  • View Item
  •   TechnoRep
  • Tehnološko-metalurški fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications (TMF)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

In Vivo Performance of Fenofibrate Formulated With Ordered Mesoporous Silica Versus 2-Marketed Formulations: A Comparative Bioavailability Study in Beagle Dogs

Thumbnail
2016
3237.pdf (923.7Kb)
Authors
Bukara, Katarina
Schueller, Laurent
Rosier, Jan
Daems, Tinne
Verheyden, Loes
Eelen, Siemon
Martens, Johan A.
Van den Mooter, Guy
Bugarski, Branko
Kiekens, Filip
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The present study aims to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo performance of ordered mesoporous silica (OMS) as a carrier for the poorly water-soluble compound fenofibrate. Fenofibrate was loaded into OMS via incipient wetness impregnation to obtain a 29% drug load and formulated into capsules. Two capsule dosage forms (containing 33.5 and 16.75 mg fenofibrate, respectively) were compared with the commercially available forms-Lipanthyl (R) (fenofibrate microcrystals) and Tricor (R) (fenofibrate nanocrystals). In vitro dissolution tests showed that the amount of fenofibrate released from Lipanthyl (R) and Tricor (R) was approximately 30%, whereas approximately 66% and 60% of the drug was released from OMS capsules containing 33.5 and 16.75 mg of fenofibrate, respectively. Storage of OMS capsules loaded with 33.5 mg of fenofibrate at 25 degrees C/60% relative humidity (RH) or 40 degrees C/75% RH did not alter the release kinetics, nor the physical state of the compound, pointing the stabil...ity of the present formulation. The in vivo study in dogs confirmed satisfying level of safety and tolerability of fenofibrate-OMS formulation (eq. 33.5 mg) with the potential to improve the absorption of fenofibrate. Though some variability in the data, this formulation is promising to be further investigated in a clinical trial setting.

Keywords:
ordered mesoporous silica / fenofibrate / poor solubility / dissolution / oral bioavailability
Source:
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2016, 105, 8, 2381-2385
Publisher:
  • Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken
Funding / projects:
  • Formac Pharmaceuticals NV, Gaston Geenslaan, Leuven, Belgium

DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.05.019

ISSN: 0022-3549

PubMed: 27364460

WoS: 000381770400017

Scopus: 2-s2.0-84979041804
[ Google Scholar ]
19
17
URI
http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3240
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications (TMF)
Institution/Community
Tehnološko-metalurški fakultet
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bukara, Katarina
AU  - Schueller, Laurent
AU  - Rosier, Jan
AU  - Daems, Tinne
AU  - Verheyden, Loes
AU  - Eelen, Siemon
AU  - Martens, Johan A.
AU  - Van den Mooter, Guy
AU  - Bugarski, Branko
AU  - Kiekens, Filip
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3240
AB  - The present study aims to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo performance of ordered mesoporous silica (OMS) as a carrier for the poorly water-soluble compound fenofibrate. Fenofibrate was loaded into OMS via incipient wetness impregnation to obtain a 29% drug load and formulated into capsules. Two capsule dosage forms (containing 33.5 and 16.75 mg fenofibrate, respectively) were compared with the commercially available forms-Lipanthyl (R) (fenofibrate microcrystals) and Tricor (R) (fenofibrate nanocrystals). In vitro dissolution tests showed that the amount of fenofibrate released from Lipanthyl (R) and Tricor (R) was approximately 30%, whereas approximately 66% and 60% of the drug was released from OMS capsules containing 33.5 and 16.75 mg of fenofibrate, respectively. Storage of OMS capsules loaded with 33.5 mg of fenofibrate at 25 degrees C/60% relative humidity (RH) or 40 degrees C/75% RH did not alter the release kinetics, nor the physical state of the compound, pointing the stability of the present formulation. The in vivo study in dogs confirmed satisfying level of safety and tolerability of fenofibrate-OMS formulation (eq. 33.5 mg) with the potential to improve the absorption of fenofibrate. Though some variability in the data, this formulation is promising to be further investigated in a clinical trial setting.
PB  - Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken
T2  - Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
T1  - In Vivo Performance of Fenofibrate Formulated With Ordered Mesoporous Silica Versus 2-Marketed Formulations: A Comparative Bioavailability Study in Beagle Dogs
EP  - 2385
IS  - 8
SP  - 2381
VL  - 105
DO  - 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.05.019
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bukara, Katarina and Schueller, Laurent and Rosier, Jan and Daems, Tinne and Verheyden, Loes and Eelen, Siemon and Martens, Johan A. and Van den Mooter, Guy and Bugarski, Branko and Kiekens, Filip",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The present study aims to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo performance of ordered mesoporous silica (OMS) as a carrier for the poorly water-soluble compound fenofibrate. Fenofibrate was loaded into OMS via incipient wetness impregnation to obtain a 29% drug load and formulated into capsules. Two capsule dosage forms (containing 33.5 and 16.75 mg fenofibrate, respectively) were compared with the commercially available forms-Lipanthyl (R) (fenofibrate microcrystals) and Tricor (R) (fenofibrate nanocrystals). In vitro dissolution tests showed that the amount of fenofibrate released from Lipanthyl (R) and Tricor (R) was approximately 30%, whereas approximately 66% and 60% of the drug was released from OMS capsules containing 33.5 and 16.75 mg of fenofibrate, respectively. Storage of OMS capsules loaded with 33.5 mg of fenofibrate at 25 degrees C/60% relative humidity (RH) or 40 degrees C/75% RH did not alter the release kinetics, nor the physical state of the compound, pointing the stability of the present formulation. The in vivo study in dogs confirmed satisfying level of safety and tolerability of fenofibrate-OMS formulation (eq. 33.5 mg) with the potential to improve the absorption of fenofibrate. Though some variability in the data, this formulation is promising to be further investigated in a clinical trial setting.",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken",
journal = "Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences",
title = "In Vivo Performance of Fenofibrate Formulated With Ordered Mesoporous Silica Versus 2-Marketed Formulations: A Comparative Bioavailability Study in Beagle Dogs",
pages = "2385-2381",
number = "8",
volume = "105",
doi = "10.1016/j.xphs.2016.05.019"
}
Bukara, K., Schueller, L., Rosier, J., Daems, T., Verheyden, L., Eelen, S., Martens, J. A., Van den Mooter, G., Bugarski, B.,& Kiekens, F.. (2016). In Vivo Performance of Fenofibrate Formulated With Ordered Mesoporous Silica Versus 2-Marketed Formulations: A Comparative Bioavailability Study in Beagle Dogs. in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken., 105(8), 2381-2385.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2016.05.019
Bukara K, Schueller L, Rosier J, Daems T, Verheyden L, Eelen S, Martens JA, Van den Mooter G, Bugarski B, Kiekens F. In Vivo Performance of Fenofibrate Formulated With Ordered Mesoporous Silica Versus 2-Marketed Formulations: A Comparative Bioavailability Study in Beagle Dogs. in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016;105(8):2381-2385.
doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2016.05.019 .
Bukara, Katarina, Schueller, Laurent, Rosier, Jan, Daems, Tinne, Verheyden, Loes, Eelen, Siemon, Martens, Johan A., Van den Mooter, Guy, Bugarski, Branko, Kiekens, Filip, "In Vivo Performance of Fenofibrate Formulated With Ordered Mesoporous Silica Versus 2-Marketed Formulations: A Comparative Bioavailability Study in Beagle Dogs" in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 105, no. 8 (2016):2381-2385,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2016.05.019 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About TechnoRep | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About TechnoRep | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB