Comparative Study on Cavitation Erosion Resistance of A356 Alloy and A356FA5 Composite
Authorized Users Only
2017
Authors
Maksimović, Vesna
Devečerski, Aleksandar

Došen, Anja M.
Bobić, Ilija

Erić, Milić D.
Volkov-Husović, Tatjana

Article (Published version)

Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In the present study, an aluminum alloy A356 composite with addition of 5 wt% fly ash was synthesized and subjected to the cavitation erosion resistance test in order to find out if this material can be used in conditions where the cavitation erosion resistance is expected. Obtained results were compared with that of as-cast aluminum A356 alloy, confirming that composite possessed better cavitation erosion resistance than original alloy and that fly ash can be used as an effective reinforcement in metal matrix composites production. Scanning electron microscopy and optical microscopy was used for microstructural analysis. Phase identification of fly ash was carried out using X-ray diffraction analysis. Several methods for monitoring the cavitation erosion resistance of A356 alloy and corresponding composite were applied, such as: mass loss (Delta m), volume loss (Delta V), level of surface degradatiom (P/Po) and pit depth.
Keywords:
Aluminum alloy / Cavitation erosion resistance / Surface erosion / Profilometer / Fly ash / CompositeSource:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2017, 70, 1, 97-105Publisher:
- Springer India, New Delhi
Funding / projects:
- Synthesis, processing and characterization of nanostructured materials for application in the field of energy, mechanical engineering, environmental protection and biomedicine (RS-45012)
- Research and verification of the multidisciplinary forensic methods in (RS-37021)
DOI: 10.1007/s12666-016-0864-1
ISSN: 0972-2815
WoS: 000392170900011
Scopus: 2-s2.0-84962278312
Institution/Community
Tehnološko-metalurški fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Maksimović, Vesna AU - Devečerski, Aleksandar AU - Došen, Anja M. AU - Bobić, Ilija AU - Erić, Milić D. AU - Volkov-Husović, Tatjana PY - 2017 UR - http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3657 AB - In the present study, an aluminum alloy A356 composite with addition of 5 wt% fly ash was synthesized and subjected to the cavitation erosion resistance test in order to find out if this material can be used in conditions where the cavitation erosion resistance is expected. Obtained results were compared with that of as-cast aluminum A356 alloy, confirming that composite possessed better cavitation erosion resistance than original alloy and that fly ash can be used as an effective reinforcement in metal matrix composites production. Scanning electron microscopy and optical microscopy was used for microstructural analysis. Phase identification of fly ash was carried out using X-ray diffraction analysis. Several methods for monitoring the cavitation erosion resistance of A356 alloy and corresponding composite were applied, such as: mass loss (Delta m), volume loss (Delta V), level of surface degradatiom (P/Po) and pit depth. PB - Springer India, New Delhi T2 - Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals T1 - Comparative Study on Cavitation Erosion Resistance of A356 Alloy and A356FA5 Composite EP - 105 IS - 1 SP - 97 VL - 70 DO - 10.1007/s12666-016-0864-1 ER -
@article{ author = "Maksimović, Vesna and Devečerski, Aleksandar and Došen, Anja M. and Bobić, Ilija and Erić, Milić D. and Volkov-Husović, Tatjana", year = "2017", abstract = "In the present study, an aluminum alloy A356 composite with addition of 5 wt% fly ash was synthesized and subjected to the cavitation erosion resistance test in order to find out if this material can be used in conditions where the cavitation erosion resistance is expected. Obtained results were compared with that of as-cast aluminum A356 alloy, confirming that composite possessed better cavitation erosion resistance than original alloy and that fly ash can be used as an effective reinforcement in metal matrix composites production. Scanning electron microscopy and optical microscopy was used for microstructural analysis. Phase identification of fly ash was carried out using X-ray diffraction analysis. Several methods for monitoring the cavitation erosion resistance of A356 alloy and corresponding composite were applied, such as: mass loss (Delta m), volume loss (Delta V), level of surface degradatiom (P/Po) and pit depth.", publisher = "Springer India, New Delhi", journal = "Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals", title = "Comparative Study on Cavitation Erosion Resistance of A356 Alloy and A356FA5 Composite", pages = "105-97", number = "1", volume = "70", doi = "10.1007/s12666-016-0864-1" }
Maksimović, V., Devečerski, A., Došen, A. M., Bobić, I., Erić, M. D.,& Volkov-Husović, T.. (2017). Comparative Study on Cavitation Erosion Resistance of A356 Alloy and A356FA5 Composite. in Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Springer India, New Delhi., 70(1), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-016-0864-1
Maksimović V, Devečerski A, Došen AM, Bobić I, Erić MD, Volkov-Husović T. Comparative Study on Cavitation Erosion Resistance of A356 Alloy and A356FA5 Composite. in Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals. 2017;70(1):97-105. doi:10.1007/s12666-016-0864-1 .
Maksimović, Vesna, Devečerski, Aleksandar, Došen, Anja M., Bobić, Ilija, Erić, Milić D., Volkov-Husović, Tatjana, "Comparative Study on Cavitation Erosion Resistance of A356 Alloy and A356FA5 Composite" in Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 70, no. 1 (2017):97-105, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-016-0864-1 . .