Is Substituting P91 for P22 Justified?

dc.creator	Milović, Ljubica
dc.date.accessioned	2021-03-10T13:29:56Z
dc.date.available	2021-03-10T13:29:56Z
dc.date.issued	2017
dc.identifier.issn	2195-4356
dc.identifier.uri	http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3677
dc.description.abstract	While refurbishing fossil fuel power plants, it is of great importance for safety precaution to replace the aged components which exceeded their designed service life with new ones. The most important parameter for thick-walled components is thickness value and the most important procedure is its reduction. Reduction of wall-thickness is achieved by changing the material of thick-walled components. In present paper some examples of wall-thickness reduction are shown in case of substituting a ferritic/martensitic micro-alloyed steel P91 for P22.	en
dc.publisher	Springer-Verlag Berlin, Berlin
dc.relation	info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Technological Development (TD or TR)/35011/RS//
dc.rights	restrictedAccess
dc.source	Fracture At All Scales
dc.subject	Service life	en
dc.subject	Power plants	en
dc.subject	Micro-alloyed steel	en
dc.title	Is Substituting P91 for P22 Justified?	en
dc.type	article
dc.rights.license	ARR
dc.citation.epage	103
dc.citation.other	: 89-103
dc.citation.spage	89
dc.identifier.doi	10.1007/978-3-319-32634-4_5
dc.identifier.scopus	2-s2.0-85019210300
dc.identifier.wos	000392140800005
dc.type.version	publishedVersion