Response Surface Methodology As a New Approach for Finding Optimal MALDI Matrix Spraying Parameters for Mass Spectrometry Imaging
Authors
Veličković, DušanZhang, Guanshi
Bezbradica, Dejan

Bhattacharjee, Arunima
Pasa-Tolić, Ljiljana
Sharma, Kumar

Alexandrov, Theodore
Anderton, Christopher R.

Article (Published version)

Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Automated spraying devices have become ubiquitous in laboratories employing matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI), in part because they permit control of a number of matrix application parameters that can easily be reproduced for intra- and interlaboratory studies. Determining the optimal parameters for MALDI matrix application, such as temperature, flow rate, spraying velocity, number of spraying cycles, and solvent composition for matrix application, is critical for obtaining high-quality MALDI-MSI data. However, there are no established approaches for optimizing these multiple parameters simultaneously. Instead optimization is performed iteratively (i.e., one parameter at a time), which is time-consuming and can lead to overall nonoptimal settings. In this report, we demonstrate the use a novel experimental design and the response surface methodology to optimize five parameters of MALDI matrix application using a robotic sprayer. Thirty-tw...o combinations of MALDI matrix spraying conditions were tested, which allowed us to elucidate relationships between each of the application parameters as determined by MALDI-MS (specifically, using a 15 T Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer). As such, we were able to determine the optimal automated spraying parameters that minimized signal delocalization and enabled high MALDI sensitivity. We envision this optimization strategy can be utilized for other matrix application approaches and MALDI-MSI analyses of other molecular classes and tissue types.
Keywords:
experimental design / METASPACE / molecular annotation / delocalization quantification / human biopsySource:
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2020, 31, 3, 508-516Publisher:
- Amer Chemical Soc, Washington
Funding / projects:
- NIH-NIDDKUnited States Department of Health & Human ServicesNational Institutes of Health (NIH) - USANIH National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [1UG3DK114920-01]
- METASPACE - Bioinformatics for spatial metabolomics (EU-634402)
- ERC Consolidator grant METACELL
- Office of Biological and Environmental Research
- DOEUnited States Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC05-76RLO1830]
- ATTRACT - breAkThrough innovaTion pRogrAmme for a pan-European Detection and Imaging eCosysTem (EU-777222)
DOI: 10.1021/jasms.9b00074
ISSN: 1044-0305
PubMed: 32126772
WoS: 000518702500006
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85081041220
Institution/Community
Tehnološko-metalurški fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Veličković, Dušan AU - Zhang, Guanshi AU - Bezbradica, Dejan AU - Bhattacharjee, Arunima AU - Pasa-Tolić, Ljiljana AU - Sharma, Kumar AU - Alexandrov, Theodore AU - Anderton, Christopher R. PY - 2020 UR - http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4489 AB - Automated spraying devices have become ubiquitous in laboratories employing matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI), in part because they permit control of a number of matrix application parameters that can easily be reproduced for intra- and interlaboratory studies. Determining the optimal parameters for MALDI matrix application, such as temperature, flow rate, spraying velocity, number of spraying cycles, and solvent composition for matrix application, is critical for obtaining high-quality MALDI-MSI data. However, there are no established approaches for optimizing these multiple parameters simultaneously. Instead optimization is performed iteratively (i.e., one parameter at a time), which is time-consuming and can lead to overall nonoptimal settings. In this report, we demonstrate the use a novel experimental design and the response surface methodology to optimize five parameters of MALDI matrix application using a robotic sprayer. Thirty-two combinations of MALDI matrix spraying conditions were tested, which allowed us to elucidate relationships between each of the application parameters as determined by MALDI-MS (specifically, using a 15 T Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer). As such, we were able to determine the optimal automated spraying parameters that minimized signal delocalization and enabled high MALDI sensitivity. We envision this optimization strategy can be utilized for other matrix application approaches and MALDI-MSI analyses of other molecular classes and tissue types. PB - Amer Chemical Soc, Washington T2 - Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry T1 - Response Surface Methodology As a New Approach for Finding Optimal MALDI Matrix Spraying Parameters for Mass Spectrometry Imaging EP - 516 IS - 3 SP - 508 VL - 31 DO - 10.1021/jasms.9b00074 ER -
@article{ author = "Veličković, Dušan and Zhang, Guanshi and Bezbradica, Dejan and Bhattacharjee, Arunima and Pasa-Tolić, Ljiljana and Sharma, Kumar and Alexandrov, Theodore and Anderton, Christopher R.", year = "2020", abstract = "Automated spraying devices have become ubiquitous in laboratories employing matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI), in part because they permit control of a number of matrix application parameters that can easily be reproduced for intra- and interlaboratory studies. Determining the optimal parameters for MALDI matrix application, such as temperature, flow rate, spraying velocity, number of spraying cycles, and solvent composition for matrix application, is critical for obtaining high-quality MALDI-MSI data. However, there are no established approaches for optimizing these multiple parameters simultaneously. Instead optimization is performed iteratively (i.e., one parameter at a time), which is time-consuming and can lead to overall nonoptimal settings. In this report, we demonstrate the use a novel experimental design and the response surface methodology to optimize five parameters of MALDI matrix application using a robotic sprayer. Thirty-two combinations of MALDI matrix spraying conditions were tested, which allowed us to elucidate relationships between each of the application parameters as determined by MALDI-MS (specifically, using a 15 T Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer). As such, we were able to determine the optimal automated spraying parameters that minimized signal delocalization and enabled high MALDI sensitivity. We envision this optimization strategy can be utilized for other matrix application approaches and MALDI-MSI analyses of other molecular classes and tissue types.", publisher = "Amer Chemical Soc, Washington", journal = "Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry", title = "Response Surface Methodology As a New Approach for Finding Optimal MALDI Matrix Spraying Parameters for Mass Spectrometry Imaging", pages = "516-508", number = "3", volume = "31", doi = "10.1021/jasms.9b00074" }
Veličković, D., Zhang, G., Bezbradica, D., Bhattacharjee, A., Pasa-Tolić, L., Sharma, K., Alexandrov, T.,& Anderton, C. R.. (2020). Response Surface Methodology As a New Approach for Finding Optimal MALDI Matrix Spraying Parameters for Mass Spectrometry Imaging. in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry Amer Chemical Soc, Washington., 31(3), 508-516. https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.9b00074
Veličković D, Zhang G, Bezbradica D, Bhattacharjee A, Pasa-Tolić L, Sharma K, Alexandrov T, Anderton CR. Response Surface Methodology As a New Approach for Finding Optimal MALDI Matrix Spraying Parameters for Mass Spectrometry Imaging. in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2020;31(3):508-516. doi:10.1021/jasms.9b00074 .
Veličković, Dušan, Zhang, Guanshi, Bezbradica, Dejan, Bhattacharjee, Arunima, Pasa-Tolić, Ljiljana, Sharma, Kumar, Alexandrov, Theodore, Anderton, Christopher R., "Response Surface Methodology As a New Approach for Finding Optimal MALDI Matrix Spraying Parameters for Mass Spectrometry Imaging" in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 31, no. 3 (2020):508-516, https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.9b00074 . .