The effects of pollinizers on pollen tube growth and fruit set of European plum (Prunus domestica L.) in a Nordic climate
Само за регистроване кориснике
2021
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Norwegian plum production is characterized by climatic limitations, different flowering time, deficiently of wholly-adapted cultivars and appropriate pollen donors for cultivars that can be grown in this region. This study evaluated the progamic phase of fertilization and fruit set in four European plum cultivars (Mallard, Edda, Jubileum, and Reeves) after crossing with different pollinizers over two years (2018/2019). Reproductive parameters, in vitro pollen germination, number of pollen tubes in the upper part of the style and locule of the ovary, number of pistils with ovule penetrated by pollen tube, fruit set in all crossing combinations, and fruit set in open pollination of pollen recipient cultivars showed different adaptability of both recipient and donor cultivars to the specific ecological conditions prevailing in Western Norway. The pollinizers Victoria, Opal and C. Lepotica proved to be a very good pollinizers for cultivar Jubileum, while pollinizers R. C. Souffriau and Val...or for the cultivar Reeves. Cultivars Opal, R. E. Prolific and Mallard are excellent pollinizers for Edda in conditions of higher temperatures during flowering period and post-flowering period. Cultivar. C. Lepotica proved to be the best pollinizer for Edda in conditions when the temperatures were lower. Cultivars Opal and R. E. Prolific can be considered as good pollinizers for Mallard
Кључне речи:
Cultivars / Flowering / Pollination / Pollen germination / ClimateИзвор:
Scientia Horticulturae, 2021, 288
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110390
ISSN: 0304-4238
WoS: 000681070500003
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85110206932
Институција/група
Inovacioni centarTY - JOUR AU - Cerović, Radosav AU - Fotirić-Aksić, Milica AU - Đorđevic, Milena AU - Meland, Mekjell PY - 2021 UR - http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4871 AB - Norwegian plum production is characterized by climatic limitations, different flowering time, deficiently of wholly-adapted cultivars and appropriate pollen donors for cultivars that can be grown in this region. This study evaluated the progamic phase of fertilization and fruit set in four European plum cultivars (Mallard, Edda, Jubileum, and Reeves) after crossing with different pollinizers over two years (2018/2019). Reproductive parameters, in vitro pollen germination, number of pollen tubes in the upper part of the style and locule of the ovary, number of pistils with ovule penetrated by pollen tube, fruit set in all crossing combinations, and fruit set in open pollination of pollen recipient cultivars showed different adaptability of both recipient and donor cultivars to the specific ecological conditions prevailing in Western Norway. The pollinizers Victoria, Opal and C. Lepotica proved to be a very good pollinizers for cultivar Jubileum, while pollinizers R. C. Souffriau and Valor for the cultivar Reeves. Cultivars Opal, R. E. Prolific and Mallard are excellent pollinizers for Edda in conditions of higher temperatures during flowering period and post-flowering period. Cultivar. C. Lepotica proved to be the best pollinizer for Edda in conditions when the temperatures were lower. Cultivars Opal and R. E. Prolific can be considered as good pollinizers for Mallard T2 - Scientia Horticulturae T1 - The effects of pollinizers on pollen tube growth and fruit set of European plum (Prunus domestica L.) in a Nordic climate VL - 288 DO - 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110390 ER -
@article{ author = "Cerović, Radosav and Fotirić-Aksić, Milica and Đorđevic, Milena and Meland, Mekjell", year = "2021", abstract = "Norwegian plum production is characterized by climatic limitations, different flowering time, deficiently of wholly-adapted cultivars and appropriate pollen donors for cultivars that can be grown in this region. This study evaluated the progamic phase of fertilization and fruit set in four European plum cultivars (Mallard, Edda, Jubileum, and Reeves) after crossing with different pollinizers over two years (2018/2019). Reproductive parameters, in vitro pollen germination, number of pollen tubes in the upper part of the style and locule of the ovary, number of pistils with ovule penetrated by pollen tube, fruit set in all crossing combinations, and fruit set in open pollination of pollen recipient cultivars showed different adaptability of both recipient and donor cultivars to the specific ecological conditions prevailing in Western Norway. The pollinizers Victoria, Opal and C. Lepotica proved to be a very good pollinizers for cultivar Jubileum, while pollinizers R. C. Souffriau and Valor for the cultivar Reeves. Cultivars Opal, R. E. Prolific and Mallard are excellent pollinizers for Edda in conditions of higher temperatures during flowering period and post-flowering period. Cultivar. C. Lepotica proved to be the best pollinizer for Edda in conditions when the temperatures were lower. Cultivars Opal and R. E. Prolific can be considered as good pollinizers for Mallard", journal = "Scientia Horticulturae", title = "The effects of pollinizers on pollen tube growth and fruit set of European plum (Prunus domestica L.) in a Nordic climate", volume = "288", doi = "10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110390" }
Cerović, R., Fotirić-Aksić, M., Đorđevic, M.,& Meland, M.. (2021). The effects of pollinizers on pollen tube growth and fruit set of European plum (Prunus domestica L.) in a Nordic climate. in Scientia Horticulturae, 288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110390
Cerović R, Fotirić-Aksić M, Đorđevic M, Meland M. The effects of pollinizers on pollen tube growth and fruit set of European plum (Prunus domestica L.) in a Nordic climate. in Scientia Horticulturae. 2021;288. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110390 .
Cerović, Radosav, Fotirić-Aksić, Milica, Đorđevic, Milena, Meland, Mekjell, "The effects of pollinizers on pollen tube growth and fruit set of European plum (Prunus domestica L.) in a Nordic climate" in Scientia Horticulturae, 288 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110390 . .