Recommendations for replacing PET on packaging, fiber, and film materials with biobased counterparts
Само за регистроване кориснике
2021
Аутори
Sousa, Andreia F.Patricio, Rafael
Terzopoulou, Zoi
Bikiaris, Dimitrios N.
Stern, Tobias
Wenger, Julia
Loos, Katja
Lotti, Nadia
Siracusa, Valentina
Szymczyk, Anna
Paszkiewicz, Sandra
Triantafyllidis, Konstantinos S.
Zamboulis, Alexandra
Nikolić, Marija S.
Spasojević, Pavle
Thiyagarajan, Shanmugam
van Es, Daan S.
Guigo, Nathanael
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
This review sheds light on urgent questions that arise from the need to replace a polymer resin,-poly(ethylene terephthalate), which represents 7.7% market-share in the global plastic demand (Plastics-the Facts 2019), by renewable alternatives. The main question that this review will address is: what are the most promising PET replacements made from biomass? Currently, under debate is naturally its biobased counterpart bio-PET (or even recycle rPET), as well as other aromatic key-players with comparable thermo-mechanical performance and enhanced barrier properties, such as poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PEF) and poly(trimethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PTF). They are most adequate for packaging, but not restricted to. Additional alternatives are the miscellaneous of lignin-based thermoplastic polymers, although the technology involved in this latter case is still premature. (Bio)degradable aliphatic polyesters, despite their typical inferior thermo-mechanical properties, can ...also play a role e.g., among PET fiber industry applications. Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is the most developed renewable polyester, already a commercial reality. All biobased polymers reviewed face a major hindrance for their wider deployment their cost-competitiveness. A pertinent question arises then: Are these alternatives, or will they be, economically feasible? Social, political and legal frameworks together with supportive financial schemes are boosting rapid changes. In the future, most probably more than one polymer will come to the market and will be used in some of the panoply of PET applications. This evaluation overviews sustainability issues, including perspectives on their green synthesis. Moreover, this review does also not neglect the accumulation of plastics waste in the environment and the inherent challenges of polymers' end-of-life. Approximately 8 M tons of polymers waste leaks into the environment each year, a fact not disconnected to PET's non-biodegradability and still insufficient collection and recycling rates.
Извор:
Green Chemistry, 2021, 23, 22, 8795-8820Финансирање / пројекти:
- Министарство науке, технолошког развоја и иновација Републике Србије, институционално финансирање - 200135 (Универзитет у Београду, Технолошко-металуршки факултет) (RS-MESTD-inst-2020-200135)
DOI: 10.1039/d1gc02082j
ISSN: 1463-9262
WoS: 000716615600001
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85120062095
Институција/група
Tehnološko-metalurški fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Sousa, Andreia F. AU - Patricio, Rafael AU - Terzopoulou, Zoi AU - Bikiaris, Dimitrios N. AU - Stern, Tobias AU - Wenger, Julia AU - Loos, Katja AU - Lotti, Nadia AU - Siracusa, Valentina AU - Szymczyk, Anna AU - Paszkiewicz, Sandra AU - Triantafyllidis, Konstantinos S. AU - Zamboulis, Alexandra AU - Nikolić, Marija S. AU - Spasojević, Pavle AU - Thiyagarajan, Shanmugam AU - van Es, Daan S. AU - Guigo, Nathanael PY - 2021 UR - http://TechnoRep.tmf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4837 AB - This review sheds light on urgent questions that arise from the need to replace a polymer resin,-poly(ethylene terephthalate), which represents 7.7% market-share in the global plastic demand (Plastics-the Facts 2019), by renewable alternatives. The main question that this review will address is: what are the most promising PET replacements made from biomass? Currently, under debate is naturally its biobased counterpart bio-PET (or even recycle rPET), as well as other aromatic key-players with comparable thermo-mechanical performance and enhanced barrier properties, such as poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PEF) and poly(trimethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PTF). They are most adequate for packaging, but not restricted to. Additional alternatives are the miscellaneous of lignin-based thermoplastic polymers, although the technology involved in this latter case is still premature. (Bio)degradable aliphatic polyesters, despite their typical inferior thermo-mechanical properties, can also play a role e.g., among PET fiber industry applications. Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is the most developed renewable polyester, already a commercial reality. All biobased polymers reviewed face a major hindrance for their wider deployment their cost-competitiveness. A pertinent question arises then: Are these alternatives, or will they be, economically feasible? Social, political and legal frameworks together with supportive financial schemes are boosting rapid changes. In the future, most probably more than one polymer will come to the market and will be used in some of the panoply of PET applications. This evaluation overviews sustainability issues, including perspectives on their green synthesis. Moreover, this review does also not neglect the accumulation of plastics waste in the environment and the inherent challenges of polymers' end-of-life. Approximately 8 M tons of polymers waste leaks into the environment each year, a fact not disconnected to PET's non-biodegradability and still insufficient collection and recycling rates. T2 - Green Chemistry T1 - Recommendations for replacing PET on packaging, fiber, and film materials with biobased counterparts EP - 8820 IS - 22 SP - 8795 VL - 23 DO - 10.1039/d1gc02082j ER -
@article{ author = "Sousa, Andreia F. and Patricio, Rafael and Terzopoulou, Zoi and Bikiaris, Dimitrios N. and Stern, Tobias and Wenger, Julia and Loos, Katja and Lotti, Nadia and Siracusa, Valentina and Szymczyk, Anna and Paszkiewicz, Sandra and Triantafyllidis, Konstantinos S. and Zamboulis, Alexandra and Nikolić, Marija S. and Spasojević, Pavle and Thiyagarajan, Shanmugam and van Es, Daan S. and Guigo, Nathanael", year = "2021", abstract = "This review sheds light on urgent questions that arise from the need to replace a polymer resin,-poly(ethylene terephthalate), which represents 7.7% market-share in the global plastic demand (Plastics-the Facts 2019), by renewable alternatives. The main question that this review will address is: what are the most promising PET replacements made from biomass? Currently, under debate is naturally its biobased counterpart bio-PET (or even recycle rPET), as well as other aromatic key-players with comparable thermo-mechanical performance and enhanced barrier properties, such as poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PEF) and poly(trimethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PTF). They are most adequate for packaging, but not restricted to. Additional alternatives are the miscellaneous of lignin-based thermoplastic polymers, although the technology involved in this latter case is still premature. (Bio)degradable aliphatic polyesters, despite their typical inferior thermo-mechanical properties, can also play a role e.g., among PET fiber industry applications. Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is the most developed renewable polyester, already a commercial reality. All biobased polymers reviewed face a major hindrance for their wider deployment their cost-competitiveness. A pertinent question arises then: Are these alternatives, or will they be, economically feasible? Social, political and legal frameworks together with supportive financial schemes are boosting rapid changes. In the future, most probably more than one polymer will come to the market and will be used in some of the panoply of PET applications. This evaluation overviews sustainability issues, including perspectives on their green synthesis. Moreover, this review does also not neglect the accumulation of plastics waste in the environment and the inherent challenges of polymers' end-of-life. Approximately 8 M tons of polymers waste leaks into the environment each year, a fact not disconnected to PET's non-biodegradability and still insufficient collection and recycling rates.", journal = "Green Chemistry", title = "Recommendations for replacing PET on packaging, fiber, and film materials with biobased counterparts", pages = "8820-8795", number = "22", volume = "23", doi = "10.1039/d1gc02082j" }
Sousa, A. F., Patricio, R., Terzopoulou, Z., Bikiaris, D. N., Stern, T., Wenger, J., Loos, K., Lotti, N., Siracusa, V., Szymczyk, A., Paszkiewicz, S., Triantafyllidis, K. S., Zamboulis, A., Nikolić, M. S., Spasojević, P., Thiyagarajan, S., van Es, D. S.,& Guigo, N.. (2021). Recommendations for replacing PET on packaging, fiber, and film materials with biobased counterparts. in Green Chemistry, 23(22), 8795-8820. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1gc02082j
Sousa AF, Patricio R, Terzopoulou Z, Bikiaris DN, Stern T, Wenger J, Loos K, Lotti N, Siracusa V, Szymczyk A, Paszkiewicz S, Triantafyllidis KS, Zamboulis A, Nikolić MS, Spasojević P, Thiyagarajan S, van Es DS, Guigo N. Recommendations for replacing PET on packaging, fiber, and film materials with biobased counterparts. in Green Chemistry. 2021;23(22):8795-8820. doi:10.1039/d1gc02082j .
Sousa, Andreia F., Patricio, Rafael, Terzopoulou, Zoi, Bikiaris, Dimitrios N., Stern, Tobias, Wenger, Julia, Loos, Katja, Lotti, Nadia, Siracusa, Valentina, Szymczyk, Anna, Paszkiewicz, Sandra, Triantafyllidis, Konstantinos S., Zamboulis, Alexandra, Nikolić, Marija S., Spasojević, Pavle, Thiyagarajan, Shanmugam, van Es, Daan S., Guigo, Nathanael, "Recommendations for replacing PET on packaging, fiber, and film materials with biobased counterparts" in Green Chemistry, 23, no. 22 (2021):8795-8820, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1gc02082j . .